In terms of Minimum Focus Distance and Maximum Magnification the EF 24-70mm f/4 is more useful. It has a Macro mode with an MFD spec of only 7.9" that yields an MM of 0.7X. In comparison the EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L II has an MFD of 15" and an MM of 0.21X which is more typical of a normal zoom.
L'af è veloce, preciso e silenzioso. Le immagini risultano nitide anche a tutta apertura, con colori caldi e saturi. Presenta un po di vignettatura a 2.8 e distorsione a 24mm, ma correggibili in post. Sfocato e stacco ottimo, ovviamente per un 2.8 nulla a che vedere con un fisso di grande apertura.
Alternatives. Canon EF 24-70mm ƒ/2.8L II USM ~$2,400 There's a reason you pay almost $1,000 more for the 24-70mm ƒ/2.8: in addition to the faster constant aperture, its image quality is much
Alternatives: Canon users can get the EF 24-70mm f2.8 II L USM from 2012. It has no image stabilization and costs around 1800 EUR. Nikon has the AF-S 24-70mm f2.8E ED VR from 2015. It’s stabilized and costs around 2100 EUR and its optical performance earned it a Highly Recommended. See my Nikon 24-70mm f2.8E VR review.
Canon RF. Canon EF. weather-sealed (splashproof) Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM. Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Art. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Has a metal mount. Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM. Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Art.
feaC. puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/463puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/321puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/152puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/383puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/142puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/114puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/344puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/15
canon ef 24 70mm f 2.8 l ii usm alternative