It’s a confusing question in the same way that getting a 24-70mm f2.8 or 24-70mm f4 lens can be mind-boggling. Canon RF 70-200mm f2.8 L IS USM: $2,799; Canon RF 70-200mm f4 L IS USM: $1,799 The f/4 might well be "worth it" for you. I have owned both lenses but I ended up keeping just the f/4. At 200mm outdoor in daylight the quality is almost identical. At 70-100mm the f/2.8 is better if you compare side by side. In the 70 and 100 range there are other lenses with f/1.2, f/1.8 and f/2. 了解隱私權條款. 請問各位大大請問一下RF24-105 F4 跟 RF 24-70 F2.8分別爬了不少文 對兩者的畫質都是評測文都是畫質很好 十分推薦但是比較找不到兩者的比較文請問兩個鏡頭的畫質差距明顯嗎?有專門評測的網站嗎?目前有RF24-105 在想是否要賣掉改換RF24-70 F2.8但 The 24-70 is much better in my opinion because the focus is much faster and locks on. with consistant confidence, the 28-70 was very sharp from f4 , 3.5 was acceptable and 2.8. only if there was no option. The 24-70 is very sharp period. I am confident you would appreciate the difference with your level of skills.
First, would I buy the RF 24-70 f/2.8 IS. Well, that's a tough one. I love my EF 24-70 II. It's a great lens and works well on the R with my control ring adapter. It's not tack sharp at the edges (not just corners) at some focal lengths - somewhere in the 35mm range - which sometimes requires too much sharpening in some larger group photos.
Crop the Tamron at 180mm a little and your image will be sharper and more detailed than the Sony at 200 mm. 180 vs 200mm is so minimal difference. There is good YouTube videos on Tammy 180mm vs Sony 200mm. I'd take a 70-180mm at f/2.8 all day over a 70-200mm at f4. Wow, never knew its a bad lens, let alone one of the worse. The Tammy it is! What is the difference between Sony FE 24-70mm F/4 ZA OSS Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* and Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III RXD? Find out which is better and their overall performance in the camera lens ranking. Nikon AF-S FX NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8E ED Vibration Reduction Zoom Lens with Auto Focus for Nikon DSLR Cameras $2,097 Nikon AF-S FX NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Zoom Lens with Auto Focus for Nikon DSLR Cameras
Canon 24-105 F4 IS vs Canon 24-70 F2.8 vs Tamron/Sigma 24-70 F2.8 IS for all round, transport and landscape. r/canon • 24mm f/1.4L USM Mk2 versus 16-35mm f/4L

Another is that the latest EF version of the 24-70 f/2.8 (the Mk II) can be had for about half the price of the RF version (where I am at least), so there's probably a good $1000 to be saved at the outset if they go with the EF Mk II.

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM (or perhaps a 16-35 f/4 or the new 24-105 is ii) Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM; Keep the Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM due to f/1.4 which is occationally handy; I like this idea! Might be nice to keep the 100-400, but you could also just use a 2X Extender with the 70-200. PHFNz.
  • puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/240
  • puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/26
  • puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/321
  • puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/236
  • puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/220
  • puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/50
  • puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/29
  • puq7m22rpa.pages.dev/55

    • canon ef 24 70 f2 8 vs f4